Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs SCHD: how they differ

DFUS and SCHD hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and SCHD hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and SCHD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSSCHD
CHEVRON CORPORATION0.55%3.84%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.51%3.55%
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.0.49%3.37%
THE COCA-COLA COMPANY0.48%3.96%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED0.43%5.10%
MERCK & CO., INC.0.41%3.87%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED0.38%5.92%
Pepsico, Inc.0.32%3.45%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC.0.30%3.66%
QUALCOMM INCORPORATED0.29%6.75%
AMGEN INC.0.28%3.48%
ABBOTT LABORATORIES0.24%2.97%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in SCHD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%Accenture PLC 2.90%
APPLE INC. 5.86%Flowers Foods Inc 0.04%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%Insperity Inc 0.03%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%CNA Financial Corp 0.02%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%AMERISAFE Inc 0.01%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

DFUS and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalSchwab
What it isU.S. Equity MarketUS dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+27.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+10.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.06%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%95.1%
Holdings223199

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD is an index equity fund tracking the US dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.7%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or SCHD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and SCHD returned +27.6%, so SCHD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or SCHD?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and SCHD charges 0.06%, so SCHD is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against SCHD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against SCHD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-SCHD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources