Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs MOAT: how they differ

DFUS and MOAT hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and MOAT hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and MOAT both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSMOAT
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%2.45%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%2.43%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%2.20%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%1.33%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%1.17%
APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.0.47%2.34%
Pepsico, Inc.0.32%1.17%
THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY0.28%1.19%
AMPHENOL CORPORATION0.27%1.50%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED0.27%1.18%
THE CHARLES SCHWAB CORPORATION0.23%2.45%
PALO ALTO NETWORKS, INC.0.22%2.51%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in MOAT
APPLE INC. 5.86%NXP Semiconductors NV 1.60%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%MercadoLibre Inc 1.28%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%
TESLA, INC. 1.78%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.13%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.97%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalVanEck
What it isU.S. Equity MarketMorningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−6.2 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.46%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%91.6%
Holdings223155

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or MOAT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or MOAT?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources