Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DFUS vs IWF: how they differ
DFUS and IWF hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and IWF hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DFUS | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA CORPORATION | 6.97% | 13.85% |
| APPLE INC. | 5.86% | 6.72% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.52% | 4.11% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 3.31% | 6.18% |
| BROADCOM INC. | 2.90% | 5.21% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.74% | 4.98% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.01% | 3.01% |
| TESLA, INC. | 1.78% | 3.65% |
| ELI LILLY AND COMPANY | 1.13% | 2.84% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 0.89% | 3.86% |
| ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. | 0.86% | 2.80% |
| VISA INC. | 0.83% | 1.68% |
| Only in DFUS | Only in IWF |
|---|---|
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30% | SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES CORP. 0.24% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26% | SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. 0.21% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.97% | AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 0.15% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.83% | Nu Holdings Ltd. 0.14% |
| INTEL CORPORATION 0.68% | ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.11% |
| CHEVRON CORPORATION 0.55% | Viking Holdings Ltd 0.06% |
| CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 0.54% | GUARDANT HEALTH, INC. 0.05% |
| THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY 0.51% | BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT LTD. 0.05% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | IWF iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Dimensional | iShares |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Market | Russell 1000 growth |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +7.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | 0.0 pts | −10.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 93.6% |
| Holdings | 2231 | 368 |
DFUS in plain words
DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
IWF in plain words
IWF is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 368 positions, with the top ten at 54.4%. It sat 5.0% below its high of Jun 1, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or IWF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and IWF returned +7.0%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or IWF?
- DFUS charges 0.09% a year and IWF charges 0.18%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DFUS and IWF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 94% of IWF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 54% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against IWF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-IWF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources