Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs IWD: how they differ

DFUS and IWD hold 58% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and IWD hold 58% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and IWD both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSIWD
APPLE INC.5.86%5.38%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%3.89%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%5.95%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.30%2.62%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%2.46%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION0.97%1.60%
WALMART INC.0.87%1.28%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.83%1.72%
INTEL CORPORATION0.68%1.72%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION0.68%0.66%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%0.63%
ABBVIE INC.0.56%1.15%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in IWD
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%WELLTOWER INC. 0.45%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%PROLOGIS, INC. 0.35%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%EQUINIX, INC. 0.29%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION 0.20%
TESLA, INC. 1.78%HONEYWELL AEROSPACE INC. 0.20%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY 1.13%DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 0.18%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 0.89%REALTY INCOME CORPORATION 0.16%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 0.86%PUBLIC STORAGE. 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionaliShares
What it isU.S. Equity MarketRussell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+27.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+9.9 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.18%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%90.2%
Holdings2231870

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

IWD in plain words

IWD is an index equity fund tracking the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +27.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 870 positions, with the top ten at 27.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or IWD?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and IWD returned +27.4%, so IWD returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or IWD?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and IWD charges 0.18%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 58% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against IWD, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against IWD, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-IWD Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources