Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs IVV: how they differ

DFUS and IVV hold 85% of their weight in the same names.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and IVV hold 85% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and IVV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSIVV
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%7.52%
APPLE INC.5.86%6.59%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%4.30%
AMAZON.COM, INC.3.84%3.62%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%3.25%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%2.77%
ALPHABET INC.2.74%2.59%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%1.92%
TESLA, INC.1.78%1.84%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC.1.30%1.42%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%1.36%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.13%1.47%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in IVV
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.35%Linde plc 0.37%
EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.25%Seagate Technology Holdings plc 0.34%
SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT 0.23%Eaton Corp. plc 0.26%
HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INCORPORATION 0.21%Welltower, Inc. 0.25%
Chubb Limited 0.18%Prologis, Inc. 0.20%
TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 0.16%Chubb Ltd. 0.19%
MEDTRONIC PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.15%Trane Technologies plc 0.17%
ACCENTURE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.15%Equinix, Inc. 0.16%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and IVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionaliShares
What it isU.S. Equity MarketS&P 500
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+17.6%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+0.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%100.0%
Holdings2231504

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

IVV in plain words

IVV is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 504 positions, with the top ten at 36.4%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or IVV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and IVV returned +17.6%, so IVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or IVV?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and IVV charges 0.03%, so IVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and IVV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 100% of IVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 85% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against IVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against IVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-IVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources