Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs IJH: how they differ

DFUS and IJH hold 4% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and IJH hold 4% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and IJH both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSIJH
CURTISS-WRIGHT CORPORATION0.04%0.77%
XPO, INC.0.04%0.67%
MASTEC, INC.0.04%0.71%
UNITED THERAPEUTICS CORPORATION0.04%0.64%
US FOODS HOLDING CORP.0.04%0.62%
TWILIO INC.0.03%0.86%
ATI INC0.03%0.74%
CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION0.03%0.85%
ENTEGRIS, INC.0.03%0.76%
Everpure, Inc0.03%0.69%
WOODWARD, INC.0.03%0.70%
BURLINGTON STORES, INC.0.03%0.55%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in IJH
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
APPLE INC. 5.86%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%RB GLOBAL INC 0.60%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%FABRINET 0.56%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC 0.45%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%ROIVANT SCIENCES LTD 0.44%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%W.P. CAREY INC 0.44%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS PLC 0.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and IJH on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
IJH
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionaliShares
What it isU.S. Equity MarketS&P MidCap 400
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+13.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−4.1 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.05%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%0.0%
Holdings2231400

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

IJH in plain words

IJH is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or IJH?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and IJH returned +13.4%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or IJH?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and IJH charges 0.05%, so IJH is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and IJH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 0% of IJH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 4% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against IJH, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against IJH, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-IJH Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources