Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs GDX: how they differ

Over the year GDX returned more, +40.2% against +17.5%, and DFUS charges 0.09% against 0.51%.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and VanEck Gold Miners ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and GDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and GDX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSGDX
NEWMONT CORPORATION0.18%10.42%
ROYAL GOLD, INC.0.03%1.95%
COEUR MINING, INC.0.03%2.38%
HECLA MINING COMPANY0.02%1.38%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in GDX
NVIDIA CORPORATION 6.97%Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd 10.67%
APPLE INC. 5.86%Barrick Mining Corp 7.95%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION 4.52%Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 5.61%
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%Anglogold Ashanti Plc 5.04%
ALPHABET INC. 3.31%Franco-Nevada Corp 4.89%
BROADCOM INC. 2.90%Kinross Gold Corp 4.40%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%Gold Fields Ltd 4.07%
META PLATFORMS, INC. 2.01%Pan American Silver Corp 2.98%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

DFUS and GDX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
GDX
VanEck Gold Miners ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundThematic ETF
IssuerDimensionalVanEck
What it isU.S. Equity MarketMiners and metals
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+40.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts+22.7 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.51%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%11.0%
Holdings223159

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

GDX in plain words

By weight, 11% of GDX's portfolio is stocks that are also in the S&P 500; its active share against the S&P 500 is 100%. The top ten holdings are 58% of the fund across 59 positions, as published by its issuer for Sep 10, 2026. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 the fund returned +40.2% with distributions reinvested against +17.5% for the S&P 500, so a holder was ahead by 22.7 pts. It sits 16.2% below its all-time high of Feb 27, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or GDX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and GDX returned +40.2%, so GDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or GDX?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and GDX charges 0.51%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and GDX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 11% of GDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Are DFUS and GDX the same kind of fund?
No. DFUS is an index ETF and GDX is a thematic ETF, so they are built for different jobs. The table compares what both publish: return, cost and what each actually holds.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against GDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against GDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-GDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources