Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
DFUS vs FNDX: how they differ
DFUS and FNDX hold 61% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and FNDX hold 61% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | DFUS | FNDX |
|---|---|---|
| APPLE INC. | 5.86% | 4.64% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 3.31% | 2.38% |
| MICROSOFT CORPORATION | 4.52% | 2.33% |
| ALPHABET INC. | 2.74% | 1.90% |
| AMAZON.COM, INC. | 3.84% | 1.86% |
| BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. | 1.30% | 1.41% |
| JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. | 1.26% | 1.38% |
| META PLATFORMS, INC. | 2.01% | 1.24% |
| EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION | 0.97% | 2.29% |
| MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. | 0.89% | 1.60% |
| WALMART INC. | 0.87% | 1.01% |
| JOHNSON & JOHNSON | 0.83% | 0.97% |
| Only in DFUS | Only in FNDX |
|---|---|
| PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES INC. 0.47% | Linde PLC 0.29% |
| LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.35% | Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29% |
| EATON CORPORATION PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.25% | Accenture PLC 0.26% |
| SEAGATE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS PUBLIC LIMIT 0.23% | Bunge Global SA 0.20% |
| Chubb Limited 0.18% | LyondellBasell Industries NV 0.19% |
| CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS, INC. 0.17% | Chubb Ltd 0.18% |
| TRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC 0.16% | CRH PLC 0.17% |
| MEDTRONIC PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 0.15% | Eaton Corp PLC 0.15% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| DFUS Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF | FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Dimensional | Schwab |
| What it is | U.S. Equity Market | Fundamental U.S. Large Company |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.5% | +26.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | 0.0 pts | +8.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.09% | 0.25% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 90.2% | 91.2% |
| Holdings | 2231 | 733 |
DFUS in plain words
DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or FNDX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and FNDX returned +26.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, DFUS or FNDX?
- DFUS charges 0.09% a year and FNDX charges 0.25%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do DFUS and FNDX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 91% of FNDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 61% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against FNDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-FNDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources