Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

DFUS vs FDVV: how they differ

DFUS and FDVV hold 37% of their weight in the same names.

Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUS and FDVV hold 37% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions DFUS and FDVV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingDFUSFDVV
NVIDIA CORPORATION6.97%6.86%
APPLE INC.5.86%5.70%
MICROSOFT CORPORATION4.52%4.50%
BROADCOM INC.2.90%3.50%
ALPHABET INC.3.31%2.21%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.1.26%2.58%
META PLATFORMS, INC.2.01%0.74%
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY1.13%0.56%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION0.54%1.78%
THE PROCTER & GAMBLE COMPANY0.51%1.81%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON0.83%0.49%
THE HOME DEPOT, INC.0.49%1.66%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in DFUSOnly in FDVV
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.84%ORKLA ASA 1.37%
ALPHABET INC. 2.74%ANNALY CAPITAL MANAGEMENT INC 1.28%
TESLA, INC. 1.78%BANCA MONTE DEI PASCHI DI SIENA SPA 1.26%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%DANSKE BANK A/S 1.24%
EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.97%BANCO BPM SPA 1.18%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 0.89%PROLOGIS INC 1.03%
WALMART INC. 0.87%STELLANTIS NV 0.96%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 0.86%AMERICAN TOWER CORP 0.94%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026.

DFUS and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerDimensionalFidelity
What it isU.S. Equity MarketHigh Dividend
Total return, 1 year+17.5%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 5000.0 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.09%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50090.2%86.7%
Holdings223196

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUS or FDVV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUS returned +17.5% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, DFUS or FDVV?
DFUS charges 0.09% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUS and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of DFUS and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 37% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

DFUS against FDVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, DFUS against FDVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/DFUS-FDVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources