Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs XLI: how they differ
CTA and XLI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and XLI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | Caterpillar Inc 8.52% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | General Electric Co 6.77% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | GE Vernova Inc 5.48% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | RTX Corp 4.44% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | Boeing Co/The 2.96% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | Union Pacific Corp 2.81% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | Deere & Co 2.77% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | State Street |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 10 | 81 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and XLI returned +14.3%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or XLI?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources