Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CTA vs VGIT: how they differ

CTA and VGIT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CTA and VGIT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CTAOnly in VGIT
SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.97%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.94%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.92%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.89%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07%United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.87%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CTA and VGIT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
VGIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Treasury Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSimplifyVanguard
What it isSimplify Managed Futures StrategyIntermediate-Term Treasury
Total return, 1 year+17.0%−1.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.5 pts−18.7 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.03%
Holdings10103

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

VGIT in plain words

VGIT is a bond fund tracking the Intermediate-Term Treasury. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −1.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. It sat 3.7% below its high of Aug 4, 2020 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CTA or VGIT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and VGIT returned −1.2%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CTA or VGIT?
CTA charges 0.75% a year and VGIT charges 0.03%, so VGIT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against VGIT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against VGIT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-VGIT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources