Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CTA vs MOAT: how they differ

CTA and MOAT hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CTA and MOAT hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CTAOnly in MOAT
SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69%Masco Corp 2.96%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72%Kenvue Inc 2.59%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44%Airbnb Inc 2.56%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76%Palo Alto Networks Inc 2.51%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75%Brown-Forman Corp 2.49%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20%Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.45%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37%NVIDIA Corp 2.45%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07%Datadog Inc 2.44%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

CTA and MOAT on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerSimplifyVanEck
What it isSimplify Managed Futures StrategyMorningstar Wide Moat
Total return, 1 year+17.0%+11.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−0.5 pts−6.2 pts
Expense ratio0.75%0.46%
Already in the S&P 5000.0%91.6%
Holdings1055

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

MOAT in plain words

MOAT is an index equity fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +11.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.46% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 55 positions, with the top ten at 25.3%. It sat 5.7% below its high of Aug 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CTA or MOAT?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and MOAT returned +11.3%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CTA or MOAT?
CTA charges 0.75% a year and MOAT charges 0.46%, so MOAT is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CTA and MOAT overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 92% of MOAT by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against MOAT, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against MOAT, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-MOAT Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources