Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs IYR: how they differ
CTA and IYR hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and IYR hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in IYR |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | WELLTOWER INC. 10.88% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | PROLOGIS, INC. 8.77% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | SIMON PROPERTY GROUP, INC. 4.79% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | EQUINIX, INC. 4.58% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | DIGITAL REALTY TRUST, INC. 4.41% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | REALTY INCOME CORPORATION 4.29% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | AMERICAN TOWER CORPORATION 3.88% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | PUBLIC STORAGE. 3.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | IYR iShares U.S. Real Estate ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | iShares |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | U.S. Real Estate |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +4.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | −12.8 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.37% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 80.4% |
| Holdings | 10 | 61 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IYR in plain words
IYR is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Real Estate. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 61 positions, with the top ten at 51.5%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or IYR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and IYR returned +4.7%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or IYR?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and IYR charges 0.37%, so IYR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and IYR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 80% of IYR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against IYR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-IYR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources