Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs IJS: how they differ
CTA and IJS hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IJS returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and IJS hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in IJS |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | MOLINA HEALTHCARE INC 1.30% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | MATCH GROUP INC 0.97% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | EASTMAN CHEMICAL COMPANY 0.84% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | CARMAX INC 0.82% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | KULICKE AND SOFFA INDUSTRIES INC 0.77% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | POOL CORP 0.75% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | LKQ CORP 0.73% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | VISHAY INTERTECHNOLOGY INC 0.73% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | IJS iShares S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | iShares |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | S&P Small-Cap 600 Value |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +22.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | +4.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.18% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 10 | 461 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IJS in plain words
IJS is an index equity fund tracking the S&P Small-Cap 600 Value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 461 positions, with the top ten at 8.3%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or IJS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and IJS returned +22.1%, so IJS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or IJS?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and IJS charges 0.18%, so IJS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and IJS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 0% of IJS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against IJS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-IJS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources