Which returned more over the last year, CTA or IGSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CTA or IGSB?

CTA charges 0.75% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CTA vs IGSB: how they differ

CTA and IGSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.

Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CTA and IGSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CTA	Only in IGSB
SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69%	EAGLE FUNDING LUXCO SARL 0.31%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72%	T-MOBILE USA INC 0.18%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44%	BANK OF AMERICA CORP 0.16%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76%	ABBVIE INC 0.14%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75%	AMAZON.COM INC 0.13%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20%	CVS HEALTH CORP 0.13%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37%	BOEING CO 0.12%
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07%	MARS INC 0.12%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CTA and IGSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF	IGSB iShares 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Simplify	iShares
What it is	Simplify Managed Futures Strategy	1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond
Total return, 1 year	+17.0%	+1.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−0.5 pts	−15.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.75%	0.04%
Holdings	10	4606

CTA in plain words

CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

IGSB in plain words

IGSB is a bond fund tracking the 1-5 Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CTA or IGSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and IGSB returned +1.7%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CTA or IGSB?: CTA charges 0.75% a year and IGSB charges 0.04%, so IGSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CTA against IGSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against IGSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-IGSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources