Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs IEMG: how they differ
CTA and IEMG hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IEMG returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and IEMG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in IEMG |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Compa 12.52% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | SK hynix Inc. 5.83% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | Tencent Holdings Limited 2.38% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 1.83% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | MediaTek Inc. 1.42% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | DELTA ELECTRONICS, INC. 1.03% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | HON HAI PRECISION INDUSTRY CO., LTD. 0.79% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. 0.74% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | iShares |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | Core MSCI Emerging Markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +30.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | +13.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.09% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 10 | 2695 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IEMG in plain words
IEMG is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI Emerging Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +30.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2695 positions, with the top ten at 34.1%. It sat 4.0% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or IEMG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and IEMG returned +30.6%, so IEMG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or IEMG?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and IEMG charges 0.09%, so IEMG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and IEMG overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 0% of IEMG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against IEMG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-IEMG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources