Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs IDEV: how they differ
CTA and IDEV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IDEV returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and IDEV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in IDEV |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | ASML Holding N.V. 1.95% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.09% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.02% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | Novartis AG 0.97% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | SHELL PLC 0.90% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | Nestle S.A. 0.90% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.87% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 0.78% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | iShares |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | Core MSCI International Developed Markets |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +18.7% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | +1.2 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.04% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 0.1% |
| Holdings | 10 | 2268 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
IDEV in plain words
IDEV is an index equity fund tracking the Core MSCI International Developed Markets. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2268 positions, with the top ten at 10.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or IDEV?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and IDEV returned +18.7%, so IDEV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or IDEV?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and IDEV charges 0.04%, so IDEV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and IDEV overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 0% of IDEV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against IDEV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-IDEV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources