Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CTA vs FNDX: how they differ
CTA and FNDX hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CTA and FNDX hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CTA | Only in FNDX |
|---|---|
| SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% | Apple Inc 4.64% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% | Intel Corp 2.57% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% | Alphabet Inc 2.38% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% | Microsoft Corp 2.33% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% | Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% | Alphabet Inc 1.90% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% | Amazon.com Inc 1.86% |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% | Micron Technology Inc 1.60% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | FNDX Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Simplify | Schwab |
| What it is | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy | Fundamental U.S. Large Company |
| Total return, 1 year | +17.0% | +26.1% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −0.5 pts | +8.6 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.75% | 0.25% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 0.0% | 91.2% |
| Holdings | 10 | 733 |
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
FNDX in plain words
FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CTA or FNDX?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CTA returned +17.0% and FNDX returned +26.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CTA or FNDX?
- CTA charges 0.75% a year and FNDX charges 0.25%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CTA and FNDX overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 0% of CTA and 91% of FNDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CTA against FNDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CTA-FNDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources