Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs XOVR: how they differ
CGGR and XOVR hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and XOVR hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.16% | 9.48% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 7.09% | 4.47% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.06% | 6.53% |
| Tesla Inc | 5.85% | 1.63% |
| AppLovin Corp | 0.57% | 3.95% |
| Affirm Holdings Inc | 0.56% | 2.64% |
| DoorDash Inc | 0.50% | 2.04% |
| Toast Inc | 0.39% | 1.71% |
| Rocket Lab Corp | 0.26% | 2.50% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| Amazon.com Inc 2.69% | Reddit Inc 2.78% |
| Visa Inc 2.34% | Axon Enterprise Inc 2.60% |
| TransDigm Group Inc 2.02% | Arista Networks Inc 2.31% |
| Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98% | Mongodb Inc 2.29% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | ERShares |
| What it is | Growth | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 89 | 32 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or XOVR?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so CGGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources