Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs XLB: how they differ
CGGR and XLB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and XLB returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and XLB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | XLB |
|---|---|---|
| Albemarle Corp | 0.40% | 2.13% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in XLB |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | Linde PLC 14.08% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | Newmont Corp 5.85% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | Freeport-McMoRan Inc 5.31% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | Corteva Inc 4.97% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Sherwin-Williams Co/The 4.95% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | Ecolab Inc 4.73% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Vulcan Materials Co 4.72% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | CRH PLC 4.67% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | XLB State Street(R) Materials Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | State Street |
| What it is | Growth | Materials |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +12.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −5.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 26 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
XLB in plain words
XLB is an index equity fund tracking the Materials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 26 positions, with the top ten at 58.5%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 26, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or XLB?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and XLB returned +12.0%, so XLB returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or XLB?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and XLB charges 0.08%, so XLB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and XLB overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 100% of XLB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against XLB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-XLB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources