Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VUSB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGGR or VUSB?

CGGR charges 0.39% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs VUSB: how they differ

CGGR and VUSB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VUSB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGR	Only in VUSB
Meta Platforms Inc 7.09%	United States Treasury Bill 4.24%
Tesla Inc 5.85%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.68%
Broadcom Inc 5.40%	PNC Financial Services Group Inc/The 0.59%
NVIDIA Corp 5.16%	United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.53%
Micron Technology Inc 4.86%	Regions Bank/Birmingham AL 0.52%
Microsoft Corp 4.38%	US Bancorp 0.51%
Alphabet Inc 3.36%	Charles Schwab Corp/The 0.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.06%	Truist Bank 0.45%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGGR and VUSB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	VUSB Vanguard Ultra-Short Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	Vanguard
What it is	Growth	Ultra-Short Bond
Total return, 1 year	+7.2%	+3.7%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−10.3 pts	−13.8 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.10%
Holdings	89	1281

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

VUSB in plain words

VUSB is a cash and treasury bills tracking the Ultra-Short Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.10% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VUSB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and VUSB returned +3.7%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or VUSB?: CGGR charges 0.39% a year and VUSB charges 0.10%, so VUSB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against VUSB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against VUSB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-VUSB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources