Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs VTV: how they differ

CGGR and VTV hold 14% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and VTV hold 14% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and VTV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRVTV
Micron Technology Inc4.86%4.89%
Intel Corp1.19%1.05%
Bank of America Corp1.05%1.37%
General Electric Co1.11%0.73%
Philip Morris International Inc0.62%1.06%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.56%1.42%
Caterpillar Inc0.55%1.84%
Amgen Inc0.53%0.73%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc0.53%0.70%
Salesforce Inc0.89%0.46%
Constellation Energy Corp0.35%0.30%
Uber Technologies Inc0.55%0.28%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in VTV
Meta Platforms Inc 7.09%JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
Tesla Inc 5.85%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
Broadcom Inc 5.40%Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
NVIDIA Corp 5.16%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
Microsoft Corp 4.38%Walmart Inc 1.87%
Alphabet Inc 3.36%AbbVie Inc 1.67%
Alphabet Inc 3.06%Cisco Systems Inc 1.57%
Amazon.com Inc 2.69%Home Depot Inc/The 1.32%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGGR and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
VTV
Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalVanguard
What it isGrowthUS value
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+5.4 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.03%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%98.6%
Holdings89308

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or VTV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or VTV?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so VTV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and VTV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 99% of VTV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 14% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources