Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SHV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and SHV returned +3.6%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGGR or SHV?

CGGR charges 0.39% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs SHV: how they differ

CGGR and SHV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SHV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGR	Only in SHV
Meta Platforms Inc 7.09%	United States of America 17.17%
Tesla Inc 5.85%	United States of America 12.38%
Broadcom Inc 5.40%	United States of America 9.88%
NVIDIA Corp 5.16%	United States of America 8.60%
Micron Technology Inc 4.86%	United States of America 8.55%
Microsoft Corp 4.38%	United States of America 8.38%
Alphabet Inc 3.36%	United States of America 6.85%
Alphabet Inc 3.06%	United States of America 6.81%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGGR and SHV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF	SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	iShares
What it is	Growth	0-1 Year Treasury Bond
Total return, 1 year	+7.2%	+3.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−10.3 pts	−13.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.39%	0.15%
Holdings	89	13

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

SHV in plain words

SHV is a bond fund tracking the 0-1 Year Treasury Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SHV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and SHV returned +3.6%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SHV?: CGGR charges 0.39% a year and SHV charges 0.15%, so SHV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against SHV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against SHV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-SHV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources