Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs SCHG: how they differ

CGGR and SCHG hold 48% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and SCHG hold 48% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and SCHG both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRSCHG
NVIDIA Corp5.16%11.02%
Broadcom Inc5.40%4.55%
Microsoft Corp4.38%7.18%
Tesla Inc5.85%3.92%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%3.46%
Alphabet Inc3.36%3.78%
Alphabet Inc3.06%4.76%
Amazon.com Inc2.69%5.68%
Visa Inc2.34%1.92%
Eli Lilly & Co1.81%3.06%
Apple Inc1.79%9.84%
Netflix Inc1.85%1.27%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in SCHG
Micron Technology Inc 4.86%Advanced Micro Devices Inc 2.94%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%Palantir Technologies Inc 1.25%
Shopify Inc 1.63%Linde PLC 0.81%
SK hynix Inc 1.62%Palo Alto Networks Inc 0.80%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.48%Crowdstrike Holdings Inc 0.64%
Intel Corp 1.19%Walt Disney Co/The 0.63%
Bank of America Corp 1.05%Arista Networks Inc 0.57%
Amphenol Corp 0.85%Blackrock Inc 0.53%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGGR and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalSchwab
What it isGrowthU.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+12.7%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−4.8 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.04%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%95.4%
Holdings89193

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

SCHG in plain words

SCHG is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or SCHG?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and SCHG returned +12.7%, so SCHG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or SCHG?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and SCHG charges 0.04%, so SCHG is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 48% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against SCHG, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against SCHG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-SCHG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources