Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs QUAL: how they differ

CGGR and QUAL hold 32% of their weight in the same names, and QUAL returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and QUAL hold 32% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and QUAL both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRQUAL
NVIDIA Corp5.16%6.52%
Microsoft Corp4.38%5.05%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%3.50%
Alphabet Inc3.06%2.54%
Visa Inc2.34%3.09%
Alphabet Inc3.36%2.12%
Netflix Inc1.85%2.00%
Eli Lilly & Co1.81%2.92%
Apple Inc1.79%6.28%
KLA Corp1.17%2.79%
Chipotle Mexican Grill Inc0.76%1.02%
DR Horton Inc0.79%0.76%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in QUAL
Tesla Inc 5.85%LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.23%
Broadcom Inc 5.40%THE TJX COMPANIES, INC. 3.19%
Micron Technology Inc 4.86%APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2.45%
Amazon.com Inc 2.69%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.12%
TransDigm Group Inc 2.02%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.92%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%SLB N.V. 1.56%
Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.68%ARISTA NETWORKS, INC. 1.49%
Cloudflare Inc 1.65%QUALCOMM INCORPORATED 1.42%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGGR and QUAL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
QUAL
iShares MSCI USA Quality Factor ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitaliShares
What it isGrowthMSCI USA Quality Factor
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+16.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−1.5 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%98.9%
Holdings89121

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

QUAL in plain words

QUAL is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Quality Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +16.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 121 positions, with the top ten at 39.1%. It sat 3.1% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or QUAL?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and QUAL returned +16.0%, so QUAL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or QUAL?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and QUAL charges 0.15%, so QUAL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and QUAL overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 99% of QUAL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 32% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against QUAL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against QUAL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-QUAL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources