Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs NOBL: how they differ
CGGR and NOBL hold 1% of their weight in the same names, and NOBL returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and NOBL hold 1% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.55% | 1.61% |
| Albemarle Corp | 0.40% | 1.31% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in NOBL |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | Nucor Corp. 1.77% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | West Pharmaceutical Services, Inc. 1.73% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | International Business Machines Corp. 1.71% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. 1.68% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Franklin Resources, Inc. 1.67% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | Colgate-Palmolive Co. 1.62% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Automatic Data Processing, Inc. 1.61% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | Hormel Foods Corp. 1.61% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | NOBL ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | ProShares |
| What it is | Growth | S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +9.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −8.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.35% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 69 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
NOBL in plain words
NOBL is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or NOBL?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and NOBL returned +9.4%, so NOBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or NOBL?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and NOBL charges 0.35%, so NOBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and NOBL overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 100% of NOBL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 1% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against NOBL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-NOBL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources