Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs MTUM: how they differ
CGGR and MTUM hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and MTUM hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 5.40% | 5.41% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 4.86% | 5.57% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.16% | 4.65% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.06% | 2.95% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.36% | 2.39% |
| Intel Corp | 1.19% | 3.84% |
| KLA Corp | 1.17% | 1.61% |
| General Electric Co | 1.11% | 1.90% |
| Amphenol Corp | 0.85% | 1.55% |
| AppLovin Corp | 0.57% | 0.87% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.55% | 3.21% |
| Welltower Inc | 0.51% | 1.04% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in MTUM |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 4.04% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | JOHNSON & JOHNSON 3.76% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION 3.62% |
| Amazon.com Inc 2.69% | EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 3.44% |
| Visa Inc 2.34% | JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 2.87% |
| TransDigm Group Inc 2.02% | WALMART INC. 2.76% |
| Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98% | APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. 2.36% |
| Netflix Inc 1.85% | THE GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP, INC. 1.69% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | MTUM iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Growth | MSCI USA Momentum Factor |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +21.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | +4.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.15% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 98.2% |
| Holdings | 89 | 125 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
MTUM in plain words
MTUM is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +21.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 125 positions, with the top ten at 40.5%. It sat 11.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or MTUM?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and MTUM returned +21.8%, so MTUM returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or MTUM?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and MTUM charges 0.15%, so MTUM is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and MTUM overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 98% of MTUM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 29% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against MTUM, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-MTUM Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources