Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs MAGS: how they differ
CGGR and MAGS hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and MAGS hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | MAGS |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 5.16% | 4.15% |
| Tesla Inc | 5.85% | 4.07% |
| Microsoft Corp | 4.38% | 3.62% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 7.09% | 3.59% |
| Alphabet Inc | 3.06% | 2.89% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 2.69% | 4.11% |
| Apple Inc | 1.79% | 4.12% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in MAGS |
|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | TREASURY BILL 65.41% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Roundhill Ultra Short Duration 8.06% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | |
| Visa Inc 2.34% | |
| TransDigm Group Inc 2.02% | |
| Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98% | |
| Netflix Inc 1.85% | |
| Eli Lilly & Co 1.81% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Roundhill |
| What it is | Growth | Magnificent Seven |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +14.4% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −3.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.30% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 26.5% |
| Holdings | 89 | 9 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
MAGS in plain words
MAGS is an index equity fund tracking the Magnificent Seven. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 26% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 9 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or MAGS?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and MAGS returned +14.4%, so MAGS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or MAGS?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and MAGS charges 0.30%, so MAGS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and MAGS overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 26% of MAGS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against MAGS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-MAGS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources