Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs FXI: how they differ
CGGR and FXI hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGGR returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares China Large-Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FXI hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGGR | Only in FXI |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | Alibaba Group Holding Limited 8.66% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORPORATION 8.25% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | Tencent Holdings Limited 7.72% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | INDUSTRIAL AND COMMERCIAL BANK OF CHINA 6.02% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | XIAOMI CORPORATION 5.41% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | MEITUAN 4.79% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Ping An Insurance (Group) Company of Chi 4.41% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | BYD COMPANY LIMITED 4.09% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | FXI iShares China Large-Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Growth | China Large-Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | −13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | −31.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.73% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 52 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
FXI in plain words
FXI is an index equity fund tracking the China Large-Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned −13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.73% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 56.6%. It sat 28.5% below its high of Feb 17, 2021 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FXI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and FXI returned −13.8%, so CGGR returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or FXI?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and FXI charges 0.73%, so CGGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and FXI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 0% of FXI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against FXI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-FXI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources