Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs FNDX: how they differ

CGGR and FNDX hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FNDX hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and FNDX both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRFNDX
Alphabet Inc3.06%2.38%
Microsoft Corp4.38%2.33%
Alphabet Inc3.36%1.90%
Amazon.com Inc2.69%1.86%
Apple Inc1.79%4.64%
Micron Technology Inc4.86%1.60%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%1.24%
Intel Corp1.19%2.57%
Bank of America Corp1.05%0.87%
Broadcom Inc5.40%0.65%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.56%1.37%
NVIDIA Corp5.16%0.55%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in FNDX
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%Exxon Mobil Corp 2.29%
Cloudflare Inc 1.65%Chevron Corp 1.49%
Shopify Inc 1.63%Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.41%
SK hynix Inc 1.62%JPMorgan Chase & Co 1.38%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.48%Walmart Inc 1.01%
Strategy Inc 1.03%Verizon Communications Inc 0.99%
ASML Holding NV 0.83%Johnson & Johnson 0.97%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 0.83%CVS Health Corp 0.91%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.

CGGR and FNDX on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalSchwab
What it isGrowthFundamental U.S. Large Company
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+26.1%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts+8.6 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.25%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%91.2%
Holdings89733

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

FNDX in plain words

FNDX is an index equity fund tracking the Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +26.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FNDX?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and FNDX returned +26.1%, so FNDX returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or FNDX?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and FNDX charges 0.25%, so FNDX is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and FNDX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 91% of FNDX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against FNDX, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against FNDX, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-FNDX Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources