Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs FDVV: how they differ

CGGR and FDVV hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and FDVV returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Fidelity High Dividend ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and FDVV hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and FDVV both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRFDVV
NVIDIA Corp5.16%6.86%
Microsoft Corp4.38%4.50%
Broadcom Inc5.40%3.50%
Alphabet Inc3.06%2.21%
Apple Inc1.79%5.70%
Bank of America Corp1.05%1.78%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%0.74%
Philip Morris International Inc0.62%1.64%
Eli Lilly & Co1.81%0.56%
UnitedHealth Group Inc0.56%0.47%
Caterpillar Inc0.55%0.46%
NIKE Inc0.41%1.02%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in FDVV
Tesla Inc 5.85%JPMORGAN CHASE and CO 2.58%
Micron Technology Inc 4.86%COCA COLA CO 1.85%
Alphabet Inc 3.36%PROCTER and GAMBLE CO 1.81%
Amazon.com Inc 2.69%GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC (THE) 1.71%
Visa Inc 2.34%ALTRIA GROUP INC 1.70%
TransDigm Group Inc 2.02%HOME DEPOT INC 1.66%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%STARBUCKS CORP 1.66%
Netflix Inc 1.85%TJX COMPANIES INC 1.65%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGGR and FDVV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
FDVV
Fidelity High Dividend ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalFidelity
What it isGrowthHigh Dividend
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts−0.3 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.15%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%86.7%
Holdings8996

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

FDVV in plain words

FDVV is an index equity fund tracking the High Dividend. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 96 positions, with the top ten at 32.5%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or FDVV?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and FDVV returned +17.2%, so FDVV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or FDVV?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and FDVV charges 0.15%, so FDVV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and FDVV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 87% of FDVV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 22% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against FDVV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against FDVV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-FDVV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources