Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs EZU: how they differ
CGGR and EZU hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EZU returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and EZU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | EZU |
|---|---|---|
| Airbus SE | 0.31% | 1.60% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in EZU |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | ASML Holding N.V. 8.10% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 3.08% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | SAP SE 2.44% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | Banco Santander, S.A. 2.37% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | TOTALENERGIES SE 2.25% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 2.22% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Allianz SE 2.18% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | Siemens Energy AG 1.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Growth | MSCI Eurozone |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +18.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.50% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 226 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
EZU in plain words
EZU is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 226 positions, with the top ten at 28.2%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or EZU?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and EZU returned +18.0%, so EZU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or EZU?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and EZU charges 0.50%, so CGGR is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and EZU overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 0% of EZU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against EZU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-EZU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources