Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGGR vs EFA: how they differ
CGGR and EFA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EFA returned more over the year.
Capital Group Growth ETF and iShares MSCI EAFE ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and EFA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGGR | EFA |
|---|---|---|
| Airbus SE | 0.31% | 0.57% |
| Only in CGGR | Only in EFA |
|---|---|
| Meta Platforms Inc 7.09% | ASML Holding N.V. 2.60% |
| Tesla Inc 5.85% | HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 1.47% |
| Broadcom Inc 5.40% | ASTRAZENECA PLC 1.36% |
| NVIDIA Corp 5.16% | Novartis AG 1.30% |
| Micron Technology Inc 4.86% | Nestle S.A. 1.21% |
| Microsoft Corp 4.38% | SHELL PLC 1.20% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.36% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 1.05% |
| Alphabet Inc 3.06% | COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA 0.98% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGGR Capital Group Growth ETF | EFA iShares MSCI EAFE ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Growth | Developed markets ex US |
| Total return, 1 year | +7.2% | +18.2% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −10.3 pts | +0.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.32% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 80.6% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 89 | 705 |
CGGR in plain words
CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.
EFA in plain words
EFA is an index equity fund tracking the Developed markets ex US. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 705 positions, with the top ten at 13.4%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or EFA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and EFA returned +18.2%, so EFA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGGR or EFA?
- CGGR charges 0.39% a year and EFA charges 0.32%, so EFA is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGGR and EFA overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 0% of EFA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against EFA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-EFA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources