Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGGR vs DFUS: how they differ

CGGR and DFUS hold 39% of their weight in the same names, and DFUS returned more over the year.

Capital Group Growth ETF and Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGGR and DFUS hold 39% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGGR and DFUS both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGGRDFUS
NVIDIA Corp5.16%6.97%
Microsoft Corp4.38%4.52%
Alphabet Inc3.06%3.31%
Broadcom Inc5.40%2.90%
Alphabet Inc3.36%2.74%
Amazon.com Inc2.69%3.84%
Meta Platforms Inc7.09%2.01%
Apple Inc1.79%5.86%
Tesla Inc5.85%1.78%
Eli Lilly & Co1.81%1.13%
Micron Technology Inc4.86%0.89%
Visa Inc2.34%0.83%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGGROnly in DFUS
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 1.98%BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 1.30%
Shopify Inc 1.63%JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 1.26%
SK hynix Inc 1.62%EXXON MOBIL CORPORATION 0.97%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 1.48%WALMART INC. 0.87%
Strategy Inc 1.03%ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES, INC. 0.86%
ASML Holding NV 0.83%JOHNSON & JOHNSON 0.83%
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 0.83%ABBVIE INC. 0.56%
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd 0.76%CHEVRON CORPORATION 0.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGGR and DFUS on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
DFUS
Dimensional U.S. Equity Market ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalDimensional
What it isGrowthU.S. Equity Market
Total return, 1 year+7.2%+17.5%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−10.3 pts0.0 pts
Expense ratio0.39%0.09%
Already in the S&P 50080.6%90.2%
Holdings892231

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

DFUS in plain words

DFUS is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Market. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2231 positions, with the top ten at 35.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGGR or DFUS?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGGR returned +7.2% and DFUS returned +17.5%, so DFUS returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGGR or DFUS?
CGGR charges 0.39% a year and DFUS charges 0.09%, so DFUS is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGGR and DFUS overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 81% of CGGR and 90% of DFUS by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 39% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGGR against DFUS, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGGR against DFUS, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGGR-DFUS Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources