Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs XOVR: how they differ
CGBL and XOVR hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and CGBL returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and XOVR hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | XOVR |
|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.19% | 9.48% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.10% | 4.47% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in XOVR |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Astera Labs Inc 7.75% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Alphabet Inc 6.53% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | Applovin Corp 3.95% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Natera Inc 3.70% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | Robinhood Markets Inc 3.56% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | Veeva Systems Inc 3.17% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Reddit Inc 2.78% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Affirm Holdings Inc 2.64% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | XOVR ERShares Private-Public Crossover ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | ERShares |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Private-Public Crossover |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | 0.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | −17.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 43.4% |
| Holdings | 77 | 32 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
XOVR in plain words
XOVR is an index equity fund tracking the Private-Public Crossover. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned 0.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 43% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 32 positions, with the top ten at 63.1%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Oct 27, 2025 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or XOVR?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and XOVR returned 0.0%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or XOVR?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and XOVR charges 0.75%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and XOVR overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 43% of XOVR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against XOVR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-XOVR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources