Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs XLU: how they differ

CGBL and XLU hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and CGBL returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and XLU hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGBL and XLU both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGBLXLU
Southern Co/The0.97%7.62%
DTE Energy Co0.69%2.24%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in XLU
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%NextEra Energy Inc 12.93%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%Duke Energy Corp 6.97%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%Constellation Energy Corp 5.61%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%American Electric Power Co Inc 5.26%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%Sempra 4.28%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%Dominion Energy Inc 4.24%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%Entergy Corp 3.71%
Apple Inc 2.00%Vistra Corp 3.55%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

CGBL and XLU on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
XLU
State Street(R) Utilities Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalState Street
What it isCore BalancedUtilities
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+2.4%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts−15.1 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%100.0%
Holdings7731

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

XLU in plain words

XLU is an index equity fund tracking the Utilities. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +2.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 31 positions, with the top ten at 57.7%. It sat 10.0% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or XLU?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and XLU returned +2.4%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or XLU?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and XLU charges 0.08%, so XLU is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and XLU overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 100% of XLU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against XLU, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against XLU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-XLU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources