Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs XLP: how they differ

CGBL and XLP hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and CGBL returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and XLP hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGBL and XLP both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGBLXLP
Philip Morris International Inc2.07%6.16%
Costco Wholesale Corp0.32%9.06%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in XLP
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%Walmart Inc 10.84%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%Procter & Gamble Co/The 7.46%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%Coca-Cola Co/The 6.87%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%Colgate-Palmolive Co 4.71%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%Altria Group Inc 4.55%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%Monster Beverage Corp 4.47%
Apple Inc 2.00%PepsiCo Inc 4.34%
Microsoft Corp 1.96%Mondelez International Inc 4.17%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

CGBL and XLP on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
XLP
State Street(R) Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalState Street
What it isCore BalancedConsumer staples
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+6.3%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts−11.2 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.08%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%100.0%
Holdings7734

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

XLP in plain words

XLP is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +6.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 34 positions, with the top ten at 62.6%. It sat 6.2% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or XLP?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and XLP returned +6.3%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or XLP?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and XLP charges 0.08%, so XLP is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and XLP overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 100% of XLP by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against XLP, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against XLP, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-XLP Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources