Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs XLI: how they differ
CGBL and XLI hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and XLI returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and XLI hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | XLI |
|---|---|---|
| GE Vernova Inc | 1.25% | 5.48% |
| Boeing Co/The | 1.07% | 2.96% |
| Deere & Co | 0.88% | 2.77% |
| Union Pacific Corp | 0.79% | 2.81% |
| TransDigm Group Inc | 0.72% | 1.29% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.58% | 8.52% |
| General Electric Co | 0.52% | 6.77% |
| Ingersoll Rand Inc | 0.47% | 0.51% |
| United Rentals Inc | 0.44% | 1.23% |
| Quanta Services Inc | 0.43% | 1.88% |
| L3Harris Technologies Inc | 0.29% | 0.94% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in XLI |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | RTX Corp 4.44% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.87% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | Uber Technologies Inc 2.55% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Vertiv Holdings Co 2.23% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | Parker-Hannifin Corp 2.14% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | Trane Technologies PLC 1.89% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Howmet Aerospace Inc 1.87% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Lockheed Martin Corp 1.79% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | XLI State Street(R) Industrial Select Sector SPDR(R) ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | State Street |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Industrials |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +14.3% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | −3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.08% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 100.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 81 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
XLI in plain words
XLI is an index equity fund tracking the Industrials. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 81 positions, with the top ten at 41.4%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or XLI?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and XLI returned +14.3%, so XLI returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or XLI?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and XLI charges 0.08%, so XLI is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and XLI overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 100% of XLI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 7% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against XLI, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-XLI Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources