Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs SPLG: how they differ
CGBL and SPLG are both equity index funds, and over the year SPLG returned more, +17.6% against +9.9%.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and S&P 500, book from IVV.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | SPLG S&P 500, book from IVV | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | S&P |
| What it is | Core Balanced | S&P 500, book from IVV |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +17.6% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +0.1 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | not published |
| Holdings | 77 | not filed |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
SPLG in plain words
SPLG is an index equity fund tracking the S&P 500. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or SPLG?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and SPLG returned +17.6%, so SPLG returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against SPLG, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-SPLG Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources