Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or MUB?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and MUB returned +0.1%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, CGBL or MUB?

CGBL charges 0.33% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs MUB: how they differ

CGBL and MUB hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CGBL returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares National Muni Bond ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and MUB hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBL	Only in MUB
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%	Board of Regents of the University of Te 0.20%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%	New York State Thruway Authority 0.16%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%	New York State Dormitory Authority 0.14%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%	Houston Higher Education Finance Corp. 0.13%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%	Northwest Independent School District 0.13%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%	Ohio State University (The) 0.13%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%	State of New Jersey 0.13%
Apple Inc 2.00%	State of California 0.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGBL and MUB on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF	MUB iShares National Muni Bond ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Capital	iShares
What it is	Core Balanced	National Muni Bond
Total return, 1 year	+9.9%	+0.1%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−7.6 pts	−17.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.33%	0.05%
Holdings	77	6603

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

MUB in plain words

MUB is a bond fund tracking the National Muni Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +0.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. It sat 3.6% below its high of Jul 6, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or MUB?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and MUB returned +0.1%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or MUB?: CGBL charges 0.33% a year and MUB charges 0.05%, so MUB is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against MUB, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against MUB, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-MUB Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources