Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs MDY: how they differ

CGBL and MDY hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and MDY returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and MDY hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGBL and MDY both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGBLMDY
ATI Inc1.23%0.74%
Royal Gold Inc0.96%0.45%
Illumina Inc0.43%0.73%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in MDY
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%TWILIO INC 0.86%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%CARPENTER TECHNOLOGY CORP 0.85%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%MKS INC 0.83%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%CURTISS-WRIGHT CORP 0.77%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%ENTEGRIS INC 0.76%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%NVENT ELECTRIC PLC 0.76%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%TECHNIPFMC PLC 0.73%
Apple Inc 2.00%STERLING INFRASTRUCTURE INC 0.71%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

CGBL and MDY on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
MDY
SPDR S&P MidCap 400 ETF Trust
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalState Street
What it isCore BalancedS&P MidCap 400, book from IJH
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+13.0%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts−4.5 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.23%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%0.0%
Holdings77400

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

MDY in plain words

MDY is an index equity fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.23% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 400 positions, with the top ten at 7.7%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or MDY?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and MDY returned +13.0%, so MDY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or MDY?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and MDY charges 0.23%, so MDY is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and MDY overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of MDY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 2% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against MDY, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against MDY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-MDY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources