Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs GRNY: how they differ
CGBL and GRNY hold 17% of their weight in the same names, and GRNY returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and GRNY hold 17% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | GRNY |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 4.57% | 2.94% |
| Apple Inc | 2.00% | 2.40% |
| Microsoft Corp | 1.96% | 2.38% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 1.25% | 3.05% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.19% | 2.46% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.10% | 2.24% |
| KLA Corp | 1.08% | 2.75% |
| Deere & Co | 0.88% | 2.30% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 0.81% | 3.02% |
| Union Pacific Corp | 0.79% | 2.39% |
| Caterpillar Inc | 0.58% | 2.69% |
| Amgen Inc | 0.54% | 2.15% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in GRNY |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Advanced Micro Devices Inc 4.17% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Alphabet Inc 2.96% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Arista Networks Inc 2.88% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | Netflix Inc 2.82% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | Bank of New York Mellon Corp/T 2.59% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Eaton Corp PLC 2.56% |
| ATI Inc 1.23% | Cadence Design Systems Inc 2.54% |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.20% | ONEOK Inc 2.49% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Fundstrat |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +13.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | −3.7 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 97.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 40 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
GRNY in plain words
GRNY is an index equity fund tracking the Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +13.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 97% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 40 positions, with the top ten at 30.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or GRNY?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and GRNY returned +13.8%, so GRNY returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or GRNY?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and GRNY charges 0.75%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and GRNY overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 97% of GRNY by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 17% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against GRNY, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-GRNY Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources