Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs EZU: how they differ
CGBL and EZU hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EZU returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and EZU hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGBL | Only in EZU |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | ASML Holding N.V. 8.10% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft 3.08% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | SAP SE 2.44% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Banco Santander, S.A. 2.37% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | TOTALENERGIES SE 2.25% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC SE 2.22% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | Allianz SE 2.18% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | Siemens Energy AG 1.89% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | EZU iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Core Balanced | MSCI Eurozone |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +18.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.50% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 226 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
EZU in plain words
EZU is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Eurozone. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.50% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 226 positions, with the top ten at 28.2%. It sat 3.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or EZU?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and EZU returned +18.0%, so EZU returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or EZU?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and EZU charges 0.50%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and EZU overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of EZU by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against EZU, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-EZU Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources