Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs EWZ: how they differ

CGBL and EWZ hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and EWZ returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares MSCI Brazil ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and EWZ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in EWZ
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%VALE S.A. 11.62%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%Nu Holdings Ltd. 8.80%
Broadcom Inc 4.57%Itau Unibanco Holding S.A. 8.57%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48%Petroleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) 6.77%
Alphabet Inc 2.78%B3 S.A - Brasil, Bolsa, Balcao 3.61%
Micron Technology Inc 2.23%AMBEV S.A. 3.23%
Philip Morris International Inc 2.07%WEG S.A. 3.08%
Apple Inc 2.00%Companhia de Saneamento Basico do Estado 2.90%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGBL and EWZ on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
EWZ
iShares MSCI Brazil ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitaliShares
What it isCore BalancedMSCI Brazil
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+32.9%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts+15.4 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.59%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%0.0%
Holdings7747

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

EWZ in plain words

EWZ is an index equity fund tracking the MSCI Brazil. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +32.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 47 positions, with the top ten at 59.3%. It sat 7.6% below its high of Apr 14, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or EWZ?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and EWZ returned +32.9%, so EWZ returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or EWZ?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and EWZ charges 0.59%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and EWZ overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of EWZ by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against EWZ, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against EWZ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-EWZ Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources