Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs DYNF: how they differ
CGBL and DYNF hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and DYNF returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and DYNF hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Holding | CGBL | DYNF |
|---|---|---|
| Broadcom Inc | 4.57% | 3.25% |
| Alphabet Inc | 2.78% | 2.10% |
| Apple Inc | 2.00% | 7.75% |
| Microsoft Corp | 1.96% | 5.35% |
| Micron Technology Inc | 2.23% | 1.35% |
| NVIDIA Corp | 1.19% | 8.62% |
| Meta Platforms Inc | 1.10% | 2.50% |
| Bank of America Corp | 0.96% | 1.59% |
| Deere & Co | 0.88% | 0.89% |
| Amazon.com Inc | 0.81% | 4.42% |
| Eli Lilly & Co | 0.73% | 0.89% |
| GE Vernova Inc | 1.25% | 0.62% |
| Only in CGBL | Only in DYNF |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | Alphabet Inc 2.87% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | Cisco Systems Inc 2.76% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | Lam Research Corp 2.71% |
| Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc 1.20% | Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.38% |
| KLA Corp 1.08% | Exxon Mobil Corp 1.93% |
| Boeing Co/The 1.07% | Johnson & Johnson 1.92% |
| Wheaton Precious Metals Corp 1.03% | Tesla Inc 1.74% |
| Royal Gold Inc 0.96% | Duke Energy Corp 1.63% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Apr 30, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | DYNF iShares U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | iShares |
| What it is | Core Balanced | U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +20.8% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | +3.3 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.26% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 98.8% |
| Holdings | 77 | 187 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
DYNF in plain words
DYNF is an index equity fund tracking the U.S. Equity Factor Rotation Active. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Apr 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 187 positions, with the top ten at 43.8%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or DYNF?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and DYNF returned +20.8%, so DYNF returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or DYNF?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and DYNF charges 0.26%, so DYNF is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and DYNF overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 99% of DYNF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 23% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against DYNF, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-DYNF Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources