Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.
CGBL vs CTA: how they differ
CGBL and CTA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and CTA returned more over the year.
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and CTA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.
| Only in CGBL | Only in CTA |
|---|---|
| Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22% | SIMPLIFY EXCHANGE TRADED FUNDS 81.69% |
| Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.72% |
| Broadcom Inc 4.57% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 3.44% |
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt 3.48% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.76% |
| Alphabet Inc 2.78% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.75% |
| Micron Technology Inc 2.23% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 2.20% |
| Philip Morris International Inc 2.07% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.37% |
| Apple Inc 2.00% | UNITED STATES OF AMERICA - BUREAU OF THE 1.07% |
Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
| CGBL Capital Group Core Balanced ETF | CTA Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it sits | Core index fund | Core index fund |
| Issuer | Capital | Simplify |
| What it is | Core Balanced | Simplify Managed Futures Strategy |
| Total return, 1 year | +9.9% | +17.0% |
| S&P 500 over the same days | +17.5% | +17.5% |
| Gap to the S&P 500 | −7.6 pts | −0.5 pts |
| Expense ratio | 0.33% | 0.75% |
| Already in the S&P 500 | 48.1% | 0.0% |
| Holdings | 77 | 10 |
CGBL in plain words
CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.
CTA in plain words
CTA is an index equity fund tracking the Simplify Managed Futures Strategy. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +17.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.75% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 10 positions, with the top ten at 100.0%. It sat 5.3% below its high of May 4, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or CTA?
- In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and CTA returned +17.0%, so CTA returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
- Which is cheaper, CGBL or CTA?
- CGBL charges 0.33% a year and CTA charges 0.75%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
- How much do CGBL and CTA overlap with the S&P 500?
- By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 0% of CTA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 0% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.
Other comparisons
Where to next
Where these figures came from
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.
Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against CTA, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-CTA Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.
A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources