Get the weekly note

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

CGBL vs CGGR: how they differ

CGBL and CGGR hold 34% of their weight in the same names, and CGBL returned more over the year.

Capital Group Core Balanced ETF and Capital Group Growth ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, CGBL and CGGR hold 34% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Positions CGBL and CGGR both hold, largest shared weight first
HoldingCGBLCGGR
Broadcom Inc4.57%5.40%
Alphabet Inc2.78%3.36%
Micron Technology Inc2.23%4.86%
Microsoft Corp1.96%4.38%
Apple Inc2.00%1.79%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Lt3.48%1.48%
Vertex Pharmaceuticals Inc1.20%1.56%
NVIDIA Corp1.19%5.16%
Meta Platforms Inc1.10%7.09%
KLA Corp1.08%1.17%
Bank of America Corp0.96%1.05%
Visa Inc0.92%2.34%
Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in CGBLOnly in CGGR
Capital Group Core Plus Income ETF 23.22%Tesla Inc 5.85%
Capital Group Core Bond ETF 15.60%Alphabet Inc 3.06%
ATI Inc 1.23%Netflix Inc 1.85%
Booking Holdings Inc 1.10%Intuitive Surgical Inc 1.68%
Boeing Co/The 1.07%Cloudflare Inc 1.65%
Southern Co/The 0.97%Shopify Inc 1.63%
Royal Gold Inc 0.96%SK hynix Inc 1.62%
Franco-Nevada Corp 0.89%Salesforce Inc 0.89%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

CGBL and CGGR on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
CGBL
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF
CGGR
Capital Group Growth ETF
Where it sitsCore index fundCore index fund
IssuerCapitalCapital
What it isCore BalancedGrowth
Total return, 1 year+9.9%+7.2%
S&P 500 over the same days+17.5%+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500−7.6 pts−10.3 pts
Expense ratio0.33%0.39%
Already in the S&P 50048.1%80.6%
Holdings7789

CGBL in plain words

CGBL is an index equity fund tracking the Core Balanced. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 48% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 77 positions, with the top ten at 59.2%.

CGGR in plain words

CGGR is an index equity fund tracking the Growth. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +7.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 81% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 89 positions, with the top ten at 44.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGBL or CGGR?
In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGBL returned +9.9% and CGGR returned +7.2%, so CGBL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, CGBL or CGGR?
CGBL charges 0.33% a year and CGGR charges 0.39%, so CGBL is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGBL and CGGR overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 48% of CGBL and 81% of CGGR by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds. Between the two funds, 34% of their books are the same securities at the same weight.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

CGBL against CGGR, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, CGBL against CGGR, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/CGBL-CGGR Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources