Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VTV?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or VTV?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs VTV: how they differ

BSV and VTV hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Vanguard Value Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and VTV hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in VTV
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Micron Technology Inc 4.89%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	JPMorgan Chase & Co 3.07%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Berkshire Hathaway Inc 2.96%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Johnson & Johnson 2.30%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Exxon Mobil Corp 2.13%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Walmart Inc 1.87%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Caterpillar Inc 1.84%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	AbbVie Inc 1.67%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	VTV Vanguard Value Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Vanguard
What it is	Short-Term Bond	US value
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+22.9%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	+5.4 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.03%
Holdings	3185	308

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

VTV in plain words

VTV is an index equity fund tracking the US value. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +22.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 23.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VTV?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VTV returned +22.9%, so VTV returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or VTV?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and VTV charges 0.03%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against VTV, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against VTV, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-VTV Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources