Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VDC?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VDC returned +4.6%, so VDC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or VDC?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs VDC: how they differ

BSV and VDC hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VDC returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and VDC hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in VDC
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	Walmart Inc 14.76%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	Costco Wholesale Corp 12.04%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	Procter & Gamble Co/The 9.27%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	Coca-Cola Co/The 8.72%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	Philip Morris International Inc 4.66%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	PepsiCo Inc 4.30%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	Altria Group Inc 3.91%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	Mondelez International Inc 2.69%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and May 31, 2026.

BSV and VDC on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	VDC Vanguard Consumer Staples Index Fund
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Vanguard
What it is	Short-Term Bond	Consumer Staples
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+4.6%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−12.9 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.09%
Holdings	3185	103

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

VDC in plain words

VDC is an index equity fund tracking the Consumer Staples. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +4.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.09% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 103 positions, with the top ten at 65.0%. It sat 6.8% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Sep 11, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VDC?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VDC returned +4.6%, so VDC returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or VDC?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and VDC charges 0.09%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against VDC, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against VDC, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-VDC Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources