Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VBIL?

In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so VBIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.

Which is cheaper, BSV or VBIL?

BSV charges 0.03% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Data as of Sep 12, 2026. Both funds on the fields they both publish, from the same sources.

ETFIQetfiq.com · independent ETF data

BSV vs VBIL: how they differ

BSV and VBIL hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and VBIL returned more over the year.

Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund and Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF.

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, BSV and VBIL hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight.

Largest positions each one holds and the other does not
Only in BSV	Only in VBIL
United States Treasury Note/Bond 1.13%	United States Treasury Bill 6.78%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.90%	United States Treasury Bill 6.10%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.89%	United States Treasury Bill 5.61%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.82%	United States Treasury Bill 5.41%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	United States Treasury Bill 5.18%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.81%	United States Treasury Bill 5.17%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.80%	United States Treasury Bill 5.15%
United States Treasury Note/Bond 0.78%	United States Treasury Bill 5.13%

Weight overlap is an ETFIQ calculation: for every security both funds hold, the smaller of the two weights, summed. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.

BSV and VBIL on the fields both publish, as of Sep 12, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
	BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond Index Fund	VBIL Vanguard 0-3 Month Treasury Bill ETF
Where it sits	Core index fund	Core index fund
Issuer	Vanguard	Vanguard
What it is	Short-Term Bond	0-3 Month Treasury Bill
Total return, 1 year	+1.1%	+3.8%
S&P 500 over the same days	+17.5%	+17.5%
Gap to the S&P 500	−16.4 pts	−13.7 pts
Expense ratio	0.03%	0.06%
Holdings	3185	26

BSV in plain words

BSV is a bond fund tracking the Short-Term Bond. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +1.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year.

VBIL in plain words

VBIL is a cash and treasury bills tracking the 0-3 Month Treasury Bill. Over the year to Sep 11, 2026 it returned +3.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.5% for the S&P 500 and +23.0% for the Nasdaq-100. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BSV or VBIL?: In the year to Sep 12, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BSV returned +1.1% and VBIL returned +3.8%, so VBIL returned more. One year is one year; the longer windows are in the table.
Which is cheaper, BSV or VBIL?: BSV charges 0.03% a year and VBIL charges 0.06%, so BSV is cheaper. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

Other comparisons

Where to next

Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure. It is not affiliated with any issuer, and a link is not an endorsement.

BSV against VBIL, ETFIQ, data as of Sep 12, 2026. Every figure is arithmetic on a named public source; the method is at etfiq.com/methodology. A comparison is not a recommendation.

Cite this page. ETFIQ, BSV against VBIL, data as of Sep 12, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/BSV-VBIL Free to use with attribution; the underlying files are at Open data.

A comparison is not a recommendation. Standards and sources